Our editorial aim is to make product information easier to evaluate, with useful detail and clear attribution.
Source priorities
We use current product labels and seller policies for product specifications and purchase terms. For health information, we prioritize government health resources, relevant original research, and other authoritative sources. A seller’s research list is a starting point for checking evidence, not automatic proof of a product’s benefits.
Claims and evidence
We attribute marketing claims to their source. We check whether cited research studied the actual product, the same ingredients and doses, and a relevant route of use. We disclose gaps that prevent a reliable comparison.
Experience and credentials
We identify research-based assessments as such. Personal-use claims require a real documented experience. Medical review is stated only when an identified qualified professional has actually reviewed the content.
Affiliate relationships
Commercial relationships are disclosed. A commission does not justify inaccurate claims, fabricated results, or an unsupported rating. Our content may identify reasons a reader should wait, ask more questions, or seek professional advice.
Corrections and updates
When material product information changes, we review the affected content and show the date of the substantive update. We do not change dates merely to make an unchanged article appear new. Correction requests will be accepted through the site’s verified contact channel once it is configured.
Content preparation
Drafting tools, including AI assistance, may help prepare text. Sources, claims, links, and final wording still require editorial checks before publication. Tool assistance is not a substitute for clinical expertise.